Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Must have if you're serious about portraits. best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. f/2! This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. 135 mm. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. See the full-size version on Astrobin. I cant seem to find this documented anywhere. To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. p.s. Add To Cart. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. Aperture ring. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. Interesting. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . Another thing that makes people go "wow" over the 135mm F2 lens design is the bokeh, which can be so creamy that distant backgrounds almost render as gradients. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? Yes, because it is not f/2. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 +1 for the 135mm lens. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. The rest are relatively uncreative, and just seem lame to me. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. This lens provides all of these requirements. (cont. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. 1. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. This thing is a beast in comparison. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. It starts out very sharp at f/2.0, gets even sharper at f/2.8, and softens only slightly at f/11. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? In the highest contrast situations there's a hint of both purple and green fringing but both are minor and easy to remove with software. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. Yes there's bokeh. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. I'll walk you through all this inc. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. Robert. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 In 3 months I got loosy focus ring. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. Digital camera types . The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. You just panned the subject for his photos and then turn around and needle thematic for looking into Ericsson. Heh, it's amazing how far Samyang has come since this article (I'm loving their 45 & 75 f1.8), and kinda amusing that they ended up delivering exactly what you asked for Kinda reminds me of that article by Roger Cicala about how long lens development takes. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). Do you expect me to gawk? Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. Taking images at this focal length from the city will swell issues with gradients, especially when shooting towards the light dome. here some information (sorry only in italian) http://www.astrovale-usm/index.html Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? No more inside shooting with flash! I bought my lens in mint condition for $350 from Japan, but I see that some retailers are asking significantly more. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. This way you get both lenses with only one! The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. The presentation and hands-on look and feel of the 135mm F/2 lens is impressive considering the reasonable price of this lens. I do not like this. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. Contrasty but not harsh. Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM lens. How good it is? - Cloudy Nights Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. If You can afford it, buy it! It turns out that this. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. If the title had been: "Testing My First Telephoto and LOVING IT!!!!!!!. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. Several functions may not work. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. Samyang/Rokinon 135mm F2 for Astrophotography: Review - YouTube As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. Seems to me that Michael is pretty new to using long telephoto lenses, he writes that the Samyang is the first he has owned. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. Not rude at all, a fair comment. It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? - Beginning Deep Sky Imaging There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. RATING. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. When stopped down to 37mm, F5.4, it is almost identical to the Takumar except that on highly enlarged images it shows a hint of coma in the distant corners. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. Seems like a great lens. I've recently started using 135 and 200mm lenses from the 1970s with my mono CCD and they've proven very useful for imaging large emission nebulae. The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). This lens is available for several camera mounts, including Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Samsung, and Fuji. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. Stuff I used to take the photos. The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. Im getting a samyang to use with my 60D. At $900 US it a relative steal. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. It's kinda curious how topsy turvy things have gotten since this article, just 4 years later, I think 135mm is possibly more niche than ever yet Samyang finally delivered an AF version of this concept at a lighter weight for E mount, but also at a higher price. Crazy fast AF! enlarge. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. My point is that we must never lose the joy of photography. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Pocketable. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. I'm not a fan of the large hood. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. It is fantastic on my old 5d. The diameter of the lens is 77mm, with a non-rotating filter mount on the objective lens. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8.
Donna Reed Grandchildren,
Central California Women's Facility Death Row,
Different Versions Of Head Shoulders, Knees And Toes,
Process Of Determining Ell Program Eligibility In Arizona,
Oath Taking Ceremony In School Script,
Articles C
